From 235a5904730d2e1b6ae00ff554587fffa70e42d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: svenguerard042 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 14:59:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add PROF ROBERT TOMBS: Mass Immigration is Destabilising Our Country --- ...mmigration-is-Destabilising-Our-Country.md | 61 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+) create mode 100644 PROF-ROBERT-TOMBS%3A-Mass-Immigration-is-Destabilising-Our-Country.md diff --git a/PROF-ROBERT-TOMBS%3A-Mass-Immigration-is-Destabilising-Our-Country.md b/PROF-ROBERT-TOMBS%3A-Mass-Immigration-is-Destabilising-Our-Country.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cbb67c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/PROF-ROBERT-TOMBS%3A-Mass-Immigration-is-Destabilising-Our-Country.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +
Last weekend, my cousin's lovely child, not long out of [medical](https://barabikri.com) school, wed her sweetheart - a good-looking young physician from an Indian family.
+
The Hindu wedding event was spectacular, colourful and huge enjoyable for everyone. Watching as young English and Indian people danced together, I showed that the day was a best example of multicultural integration as we all wish it to be.
+
But it is alarmingly naive to take these advantages for granted and to expect that the conference of cultures will automatically result in universal love.
+
The UK has probably the very best record of any country in the manner in which, for hundreds of years, it has actually taken in immigrants and [refugees](https://bestrealestateedmonton.com) from every corner of the world, providing a safe and civilised haven.
+
From the Huguenot Protestants who got away massacres in France during the 16th century, to the Jews getting away Nazi genocide during the Second World War, right as much as the Ukrainian women and children offered shelter today, British tolerance and compassion have actually been a lifeline for millions.
+
Now that tolerance is being extended to its limits. Mass migration, intensified by people-smuggling on an industrial scale, is destabilising our nation.
+
We need to not fall under the trap of [expecting](https://acebrisk.com) that, because it has typically worked out fine in the past, Britain can absorb any amount of market modification.
+
We have never seen escalating migration on anything like the scale of the past twenty years, wites Prof Robert Tombs
+
History shows that, even here, unexpected increases of migration have actually triggered turmoils that last for centuries. And we have actually never ever seen escalating immigration on anything like the scale of the previous twenty years.
+
Official figures from the Department for Education revealed on Thursday that white British children are already the minority in one in 4 schools in England.
+
This improvement has actually been particularly marked in our huge cities. At Rockwood Academy in Birmingham, for example, there was not a single white British student tape-recorded among the 1,084 who go to the school.
+
Last week also saw the publication of a report from Professor Matt Goodwin at Buckingham University, forecasting that white Britons will be a minority of the population by 2063 - barely more than a single generation.
+
By the end of the century, according to his figures, 60 per cent of the nation will have been born overseas or will have at least one moms and dad who is an immigrant. Already, more than 19 percent of Britons will be Muslim (compared to the current 7 percent). Goodwin's projections are based on census information and figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
+
I presume these numbers badly ignore the true rate of change. They assume a steady increase and stable geopolitical conditions, when we have every reason to anticipate both of those aspects will prove unpredictable.
+
An anti-immigration protester holds up a placard throughout a demonstration in Dover in 2020
+
Climate modification might have a devastating result on migration, if even one or 2 of the more alarmist theories are substantiated.
+
Tens of countless individuals in low-lying countries such as Bangladesh might be made homeless if sea levels increase. Millions more would leave their homes if glacial melt in the Himalayas caused devastating flooding in India.
+
Civil wars in Sudan, Congo and Eritrea have currently driven enormous varieties of individuals to cross the Mediterranean into Europe. African countries from Nigeria to South Africa remain in threat of tearing themselves apart, and the outcome would be an enormous rush of individuals seeking to get away the battling.
+
These upheavals would be small compared to the after-effects of war between India and Pakistan, or in the Middle East. In those cases, Europe could see 100 million refugees or more.
+
Contribute to that the increase of organised criminal activity and individuals trafficking. For all Sir Keir Starmer's bluster about 'smashing the gangs', he closes his eyes to the fact that this is a multi-billion-pound company - one that will not cease simply due to the fact that he makes speeches.
+
These are not minor lawbreakers. They are international cartels, who have actually found a revenue stream that rivals revenues from the drugs trade. The Government has no ideas at all about how to stop them.
+
The varieties of financial migrants making the risky crossing from France in overloaded rowboats are installing, in some cases topping more than 1,000 in a single day.
+
The cumulative impact is overwhelming. According to your house of Commons library, 44,000 people showed up illegally in the 12 months to March - which figure, of course, represents only the people we understand about. A lot more have likely slipped under the radar, landing unnoticed or hidden in trucks and containers.
+
But 44,000 corresponds to just 5 per cent of the [immigration](https://bmasurveys.com) overall for the year. Legal arrivals surpass the unlawful ones by about 20-to-one.
+
Nothing in our long and interesting island story has ever come close to this. Mass migration, introduced by New Labour under Tony Blair, is a careless experiment in demographic transformation that has actually never been tried in Britain before.
+
But it has happened elsewhere. And for native populations, it has often been devastating.
+
When Europeans settled in the Americas, from the 16th century, they required their way on to the land. In Australia and New Zealand - countries that were much less largely inhabited - there was less massive violence but the effect on the aboriginal people was no less destructive.
+
Significantly, the British Empire never permitted migration to India, which had a large settled population. British topics were encouraged to settle just in [sparsely peopled](https://property88.co.ug) areas: for circumstances, Canada and wide-open parts of Africa such as Kenya.
+
But in every case, when this process began, it was quickly unmanageable. More than six million Irish emigrants gotten here in the US during the 19th century, a 3rd of them in the area of less than a years from 1845.
+
Almost as lots of Italians emigrated to America, most of them between 1880 and the early 1920s. In a nation riven with racial divisions, the Italian and Irish neighborhoods battled to make it through, typically naturally by tough work, but also by political corruption and organised crime.
+
Starry-eyed Left-wingers like to claim that Britain too is a 'nation of immigrants'. That's entirely disingenuous.
+
William the Conqueror, who got here throughout the Channel in 1066 with his own flotilla of boats, brought just about 7,000 guys. Yet that little army and the French-speaking Norman immigrants who followed damaged the native Anglo-Saxon culture and subjugated a whole people.
+
Almost every large Saxon structure was demolished, the ruling elite was replaced, their residential or commercial property took and the language changed beyond recognition. For centuries, Saxons were required to labour as serfs, despised as an inferior race by the colonising elite. Even Saxon saints were demoted.
+
It took a minimum of 400 years for the aftershocks of the Norman invasion to diminish.
+
Resentments ran so deep they are still noticeable in our folk legends: Robin Hood was imagined as a Saxon knight fighting Norman oppression. The idea of this 'Norman Yoke' inspired democrats well into the reign of Victoria.
+
Even today, almost a thousand years later on, the Conquest might be embedded in our class system.
+
A 2011 study discovered that Britons with names showing Norman descent - such as Mandeville, Lacy, Glanville or Percy - were on average ten percent much better off than those with Saxon artisan names such as Smith, Cooper, Baker or Shepherd, nearly a millennium after the Battle of Hastings.
+
To understand fully how severely harmed a country can be by unrestrained immigration, we need only look at Northern Ireland. During the 17th century, 10s of thousands of Scottish protestants migrated to Ulster. Though separated by the Irish Sea, these 2 nations are so close that on a clear day they are noticeable to each other.
+
This was a state task, started by the Scottish and English federal governments during James I's reign, and developed as a method of ending mass poverty in Scotland by motivating individuals to live by farming in Ireland.
+
Well, all of us understand the result: it resulted in enmity and violence still prevalent today that has actually seen thousands killed over the centuries.
+
Not all the social inequality in Britain is the [outcome](https://commercialproperty.im) of the Norman intrusion, of course, any more than all Ireland's Troubles were the effect of a plan to relieve hunger in Scotland.
+
But when problems have complicated causes, [people seek](https://leonardleonard.com) simple scapegoats - and migration will always supply one.
+
The UK population is now 69.5 million, according to the ONS. (Many think it to be
+
significantly greater). That's a boost of 10 million this century. Yet the birth rate is falling: in 2023 it reached its lowest rate on record in England and Wales, at 1.44 kids per female, compared to the 'replacement rate' of 2.1 - the variety of kids needed to keep numbers steady.
+
If our growing population is not due to childbirth, it should be driven by migration.
+
The falling birth rate is not a new phenomenon. In 1938, it was predicted that the UK population would peak within five years at 41 million, and that it would then fall progressively for the next 3 decades, to 31 million by 1975.
+
In the occasion, this ended up being nonsense, partly since the main stats did not prepare for the Second World War and the child boom that followed.
+
But the forecasts likewise stopped working to appraise the beginnings of migration from previous nests, with lots of thousands getting here from the West Indies after 1948 - the 'Windrush generation' - and Pakistan and India following independence and partition in 1947.
+
There were other surges, for instance from East Africa after the increase of the despot Idi Amin who expelled 80,000 Ugandan Asians, amongst them the moms and dads of former Home Secretary Priti Patel.
+
Crucially, the great majority of these immigrants were figured out to incorporate into British life. If not currently English-speaking, they found out the language. They looked for work or began services. Many brought much needed skills and dynamism.
+
But that is not the case today. A high proportion of legal immigrants concern do low-paid work, for example in care homes and the hospitality sector. Those who certify under the government visa plan for competent employees or health and care employees can anticipate to be paid 80 percent of the basic income.
+
Those in the [fishing](https://getpropt.com) market, for example, get ₤ 12.82 an hour, rather than ₤ 15.88 for British workers. A comparable discrepancy uses in many trades from welding to dance and choreography.
+
When will white Brits become an [ethnic minority](https://patrimoniomallorca.com)? Map exposes neighbourhoods where they already are
+
This has a threefold result: incomes are depressed, new arrivals reside in relative poverty, and many British individuals have actually left of the labour market. [Resentments grow](https://axxessrealty.com) on all sides and the expense is unsustainable.
+
Many other migrants, it needs to be stated, take complete advantage of our generous asylum system - including housing (in some cases in comfy hotels), food, complimentary NHS healthcare and even spending cash.
+
The best source of bitterness, though, comes when immigrants refuse to incorporate. Incredibly, many on the Left motivate this by trashing our culture and libelling our history - raising every background other than the indigenous one. It spells disaster for our future when immigrants are encouraged to remain locked within their own neighborhoods and taught that the British have constantly been their opponents.
+
How unsafe this is, we can see by looking across the Channel, to France where 2nd and third generation immigrants from North Africa create a constant state of unrest. Riots are frequent, car-burning is a nationwide sport and extremist politicians talk of're-migration' - the expulsion of people who 'don't fit in'.
+
This will be Britain's future if the does not take control of the scenario right now. Immigration can benefit everyone, however just if it is strictly managed, democratically accepted and culturally integrated.
+
Allowed to run out of control, as the arc of history shows, it ruins countries.
+
Professor Robert Tombs is the author of The English And Their History
+
FranceIndia
\ No newline at end of file